Skip to main content

The Woman Question

In "Invisible Man" by Ralph Ellison, the narrator spends a great deal of his time with 'The Brotherhood' dealing with problems of race. However, after an extremely unfair interaction with the committee and Brother Wrestrum, he is moved downtown to deal with something that the Brotherhood calls "the woman question." This appears to be a feminist branch of the brotherhood in downtown Manhattan. However almost as soon as he enters this branch, a couple of things become abundantly clear to the reader. First of all the reader probably notices that the narrator is extraordinarily unqualified to work with feminists as he seems to have minimal interactions with women, let alone actual conversations or other things that would let him understand what feminism is. The reader will probably also notice how fake of a movement this feminist branch seems to be. Very little actually happens in terms of actual organization and the most important thing that happens (at least from the narrator's perspective) is his participation in an affair with one of the members of the group.

The way the feminist branch was portrayed seemed really strange to me and I couldn't really tell what Ellison was trying to say about the feminist movement. I felt like I wanted to believe that he was somehow critiquing how the communists were involved in the feminist movement and that they were doing things wrong like they were with the African American rights movement. However, considering the lack real female characters within the story and the two biggest female characters being pretty bad stereotypes, it seems like Ellison might have more negative views on the feminist movement, or at least not be a strong enough supporter of the movement to make that kind of critique. To me, it seems like it is possible that the section on "the woman question" could be read as Ellison trying to point out flaws in the way communists (or men in general) were involved in the feminist movement. However, it seems more likely that he just wanted to use it as a place to put the narrator for a short time to move the plot along.

Comments

  1. Good post! I agree that it is hard to understand if Ellison included the Women Question as a place to move the narrator or critique the communist involvement in this issue. Given Ellison's portrayal of women thus far, I don't think Ellison is very sympathetic towards the issue. Also the way he describes the scene as unorganized, I'm skeptical of Ellison's feelings about women.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It's definitely unclear why Ellison includes the Woman Interlude. I agree with you that it's reflective on Ellison's critique of the feminist movement. And as you pointed out, there aren't any female characters in the book (besides Mary, who we've left at this point) that you really feel any sympathy for. I think that and the lack of detail on Ellison's part of Brotherhood Feminist Ideology all points to an uninterested attitude towards the feminist cause.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Beloved (the girl)

When I first started writing this post I wanted to write about how confusing Beloved is as a character for the other characters in the book but also the readers. (As she just randomly appears and just assimilated with the family.) However, after today's reading, I'm even more confused than ever. I thought she was just going to be a kind of weird person in the family but she not only has a weird obsession with Sethe, but she also has some habits that I just don't know how to react to. First of all, just as a person, she just (to me at least) seems really manipulative. She has Denver completely under her thumb and it seems like Sethe listens to her pretty much all the time no matter what she says or does. But also she just seems to use people without thinking about them at all. She uses Denver to learn about Sethe even though it hurts Denver and she uses her as a kind of substitute when Sethe isn't around. She also uses Paul D for her affair thing (which also seems to rea

Walk like freedom

As much as I usually dislike poetry, I've been finding the poems that people are choosing to read in class very powerful in a way that most poetry I've been forced to read in the past just wasn't. I felt like the poems have been more effective than the novels at expressing their protests. The poem I wanted to write about is "Walk Like Freedom" by Carolyn Rodgers. In the class discussion, people (I don't remember who sorry) brought up how carefree the white woman is in the poem and how entitled both white people are. The woman's carefreeness is shown by how she comments on the weather. As if the only thing she has to worry about is the weather. This shows her privilege as it shows that she is worrying about such small things. It also shows her privilege in that she feels entitled to better weather than there is currently. The man shows his entitlement when he says that "the train must not be late" as if the world should change for him and he is

The hole

In my poetry reading I talked about the poem "The Wrong Street" by Cornelius Eady. In the fifth line, Eady says "the young white men at your back" while he talks about someone getting chased for being black and in the wrong neighborhood. This pretty obviously is a reference to violence committed against black people by white people (and in this case not the police). At first I connected this to Ralph Ellison's  Native Son. This was because of the scene where Bigger first goes to the neighborhood where Mr. Dalton lives. Bigger is very careful of how he looks trying to go to Mr. Dalton's house and even is careful about how he goes in the house because he is worried that other white people in the neighborhood will be suspicious and call the cops or try to do something themselves. Bigger expresses these fears once again when he is trying to deliver the ransom note to Mr. Dalton's house and he doesn't know how to approach the house. Once I finished  Inv